Tropical reef sponges do not live on their own, as millions of microbes (bacteria and archaea) live inside them, collectively termed the sponge microbiome. These microbes can make up 35% of the sponge biomass and exceed 40,000 genetically distinct taxa (3, 4) that are thought to be critical for sponge health. For example, they are thought to provide the host (i.e. the sponge) with nutrients and vitamins, and remove waste products such as ammonia (5). However, these hypotheses are based on 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, meaning that the microbes’ identities cannot be linked to their functions. Or in other words, we do not know who does what.
To better understand the functional potential of the sponge microbiome and therefore the ecology of sponges, we sequenced 259 microbial genomes from the sponge Ircinia ramosa, inferring their functional roles from their genes and linking them to specific taxonomic groups. Not only did we considerably expand the number and diversity of currently available sponge symbiont genomes, we also identified redundancy in critical functions as well as specific functions carried out by key microbial taxa. For example, the genes that encode multiple autotrophic carbon fixation pathways were spread across diverse microbial phyla. This could mean that multiple microbes are involved in transferring carbon to the sponge host. If so, it might also underlie the resilience of sponges to environmental disturbances (such as increasing seawater temperatures). Furthermore, the Nitrosopumilaceae (a family within the Archaea) were the only group capable of oxidizing ammonia, removing a toxic waste product produced by the sponge. Loss of the Nitrosopumilaceae could therefore have a significant negative effect on the health of the sponge. With this research we are now one step closer to understanding how sponges, critical members of coral reef ecosystems, function as a whole.
By the way: did you see the frogfish in the cover photo? Photo credit: Benjamin Mueller, University of Amsterdam.
The sponge Ircinia ramosa from John Brewer Reef in the Great Barrier Reef. Photo credit: Heidi Luter, Australian Institute of Marine Science.
References 1. Bell JJ. The functional roles of marine sponges. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2008;79(3):341-53. 2. De Goeij JM, Van Oevelen D, Vermeij MJ, Osinga R, Middelburg JJ, de Goeij AF, et al. Surviving in a marine desert: the sponge loop retains resources within coral reefs. Science. 2013;342(6154):108-10. 3. Thomas T, Moitinho-Silva L, Lurgi M, Björk JR, Easson C, Astudillo-García C, et al. Diversity, structure and convergent evolution of the global sponge microbiome. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11870. 4. Webster NS, Thomas T. The sponge hologenome. MBio. 2016;7(7):e00135-16. 5. Pita L, Rix L, Slaby BM, Franke A, Hentschel U. The sponge holobiont in a changing ocean: from microbes to ecosystems. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):46.
You can consent to the use of such technologies by closing this notice.
Customise your preferences for any tracking technology
The following allows you to customize your consent preferences for any tracking technology used
to help us achieve the features and activites described below. To learn more about how these trackers help us
Register to Nature Portfolio Microbiology Community
The Nature Portfolio Microbiology Community provides a forum for the sharing and discussion of ideas and opinions about microbiology. Through posts, discussion, image and video content, the community space can be used by members to communicate with each other, and with editors, about topics ranging from the science itself through to policy, society and day to day life. It is also a place to learn more about the activities of Nature Microbiology's editors and the policies and practices of the journal.