Insights into the Regulation of Gene Transfer Agent Production

Gene Transfer Agents (GTAs) are similar to traditional viruses in many ways but, instead of prioritizing the spread of their own genes, they package and disseminate the entire genome of the bacterial host. Expression of the GTA genes is controlled by various host regulator proteins and release from the producer cell is achieved via lysis from within. Indiscriminate transfer of bacterial genes clearly has the potential to impact bacterial evolution, but there are large gaps in our knowledge of GTA biology.

I began my research career as a traditional bacteriophage biologist and I confess that before working with Gene Transfer Agents (GTAs) I had no idea that they existed. I have since discovered that this view is a common one. 


This photograph was taken by the author during a 2010 ‘pilgrimage’ to the eutrophic lake in interior British Columbia where the model GTA producer strain (R. capsulatus B10) was first isolated

GTAs were first discovered in Rhodobacter capsulatus in the 1970s1, but were mostly overlooked until Andrew Lang and Tom Beatty instigated a resurgence in GTA research with the first in-depth genetic analysis of a GTA2. Since then there have been a number of important advances in our understanding of specific aspects of GTA regulation and release3,4 but the big questions still remain unanswered – How do GTAs provide sufficient benefit to their host to justify their continued retention? (Indeed a recent attempt to model their impact came to the conclusion that there is no discernible benefit5, which highlights the need for more experimental data) How do they package exclusively random DNA in contrast to every other virus? How prevalent are they beyond the Rhodobacterales? What impact do they have on the spread of antibiotic resistance or other genes of anthropic importance?

Cultures of the model GTA producer
(R. capsulatus B10, Red) and a GTA
overproducer derivative (DE442, Green)

The journey for this paper began with another fundamental gap in our knowledge of GTA biology, namely how is GTA expression hardwired into host regulatory pathways? Over the past decade, numerous pleiotropic regulatory systems have been shown to influence GTA production (e.g. SOS response, stringent response, quorum sensing, etc.6-9) but all act indirectly. In this paper, RNAseq was used to compare the transcriptome of a wild-type R. capsulatus strain and a GTA overproducer with the aim of identifying key regulators of GTA production. These data led to the in-depth characterization of a transcription factor, renamed GTA Activation Factor A or GaFA, which binds to and activates transcription from the core GTA promoter. GafA is the first direct regulator to have been identified for any GTA system. Expression of GafA is in turn directly controlled by a global cell regulator (CtrA) and a quorum sensing response regulator (GtaR), which provides the clear link to host regulatory pathways that had previously proven elusive. 


It is my hope that these findings, and others from my lab and elsewhere, could facilitate the discovery of novel GTAs in diverse species. Through development of easier identification and characterization methods study of GTAs will become accessible to a wider range of researchers and we may finally realize their true prevalence and impact.

Bibliography

  1. Marrs, B. Genetic recombination in Rhodopseudomonas capsulata. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 71, 971–973 (1974).
  2. Lang, A. S. & Beatty, J. T. Genetic analysis of a bacterial genetic exchange element: the gene transfer agent of Rhodobacter capsulatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97, 859–864 (2000).
  3. Westbye, A. B., Beatty, J. T. & Lang, A. S. Guaranteeing a captive audience: coordinated regulation of gene transfer agent (GTA) production and recipient capability by cellular regulators. Curr Opin Microbiol 38, 122–129 (2017).
  4. Lang, A. S., Zhaxybayeva, O. & Beatty, J. T. Gene transfer agents: phage-like elements of genetic exchange. Nat Rev Microbiol 10, 472–482 (2012).
  5. Redfield, R. J. & Soucy, S. M. Evolution of bacterial gene transfer agents. Front Microbiol 9, 2527 (2018).
  6. Fogg, P. C. M., Westbye, A. B. & Beatty, J. T. One for all or all for one: heterogeneous expression and host cell lysis are key to gene transfer agent activity in Rhodobacter capsulatus. PLoS ONE 7, e43772 (2012).
  7. Mercer, R. G. et al. Loss of the response regulator CtrA causes pleiotropic effects on gene expression but does not affect growth phase regulation in Rhodobacter capsulatus. J Bacteriol 192, 2701–2710 (2010).
  8. Westbye, A. B. et al. The protease ClpXP and the PAS-domain protein DivL regulate CtrA and gene transfer agent production in Rhodobacter capsulatus. Appl Environ Microbiol (2018). doi:10.1128/AEM.00275-18
  9. Kuchinski, K. S., Brimacombe, C. A., Westbye, A. B., Ding, H. & Beatty, J. T. The SOS Response Master Regulator LexA Regulates the Gene Transfer Agent of Rhodobacter capsulatus and Represses Transcription of the Signal Transduction Protein CckA. J Bacteriol 198, 1137–1148 (2016).
Go to the profile of Paul Christopher Michael Fogg

Paul Christopher Michael Fogg

Sir Henry Dale Fellow, University of York

No comments yet.